Skip to content

2 Comments

  1. M. Rice
    November 4, 2024 @ 2:36 pm

    There is an enormous unexplored human risk here, as well. Firefighters, who risk their lives to save people, homes and the environment, are obviously exposed to high levels of these chemicals on every single workday. Are they tested for, and subsequently treated for, poisoning from these chemicals? What about those who live in areas treated by these noxious substances?

  2. David Main
    November 3, 2024 @ 10:37 am

    It is frightening to know that that we are purposely applying heavy metals onto our natural areas. Aside from obvious human exposure concerns there is the effect on other living organisms, e.g. fish, birds, insects, amphibians. Such a massive impact is not acceptable. Decimation of their ranks is just not in our interests.

    Then there is the question of whether the fire retardants accomplish much.

    This spraying process should be halted until manufacturers come up with products that do not contain toxic materials and show evidence that their materials are actually effective. Public moneys could be better spent on proper fire prevention policy such as wider use of controlled burns, siting of future development in less fire risk areas, and solving climate change such as moving away from fossil fuel use.